router

• Re: router - tide -[4/5/2002 4:53:12 AM (GMT+0)]
  • Re: router - kenny -[4/5/2002 6:37:50 AM (GMT+0)]
    • Re: router - tide -[4/5/2002 6:57:28 AM (GMT+0)]
      • Re: router - kenny -[4/5/2002 7:42:07 PM (GMT+0)]
        • Re: router - DeLang -[4/5/2002 8:41:58 PM (GMT+0)]
        • That's a load of BS - Ben -[4/5/2002 8:19:05 PM (GMT+0)]
          • ....within the capped limit, if one exists (nt) - ludicrous -[4/5/2002 8:35:11 PM (GMT+0)]
• they're inept, I think - kenny -[4/5/2002 1:24:16 AM (GMT+0)]
  • I don - Ben -[4/5/2002 3:03:51 AM (GMT+0)]
    • Re: I don't think I can type, nonethless (content here) - Ben -[4/5/2002 3:05:37 AM (GMT+0)]
• use the newletter to heat your home - ludicrous -[4/4/2002 8:46:59 PM (GMT+0)]
  • can they do anything? - kenny -[4/4/2002 9:02:08 PM (GMT+0)]
    • Nah - LED -[4/4/2002 9:44:20 PM (GMT+0)]
      • Re: Nah - Castle50 -[4/4/2002 11:05:05 PM (GMT+0)]
        • afaik this has already survived a court test - ludicrous -[4/4/2002 11:24:23 PM (GMT+0)]
          • Re: afaik this has already survived a court test - Castle50 -[4/4/2002 11:40:02 PM (GMT+0)]
            • Play dumb - LED -[4/4/2002 11:55:55 PM (GMT+0)]
              • Who need to play? (NT) - Castle50 -[4/5/2002 12:25:00 AM (GMT+0)]
                • Re: Who need to play? (NIT) - LED -[4/5/2002 12:35:57 AM (GMT+0)]
                  • Reread your subject, you told him to play dumb - Stimp -[4/5/2002 3:19:30 AM (GMT+0)]
                    • Re: Reread your subject, you told him to play dumb - Castle50 -[4/5/2002 4:15:21 AM (GMT+0)]
                      • ROFL - ludicrous -[4/5/2002 6:46:28 AM (GMT+0)]
                        • What was the subject ? - Bob -[4/5/2002 9:57:19 AM (GMT+0)]
                    • Yep and that's why - LED -[4/5/2002 4:00:25 AM (GMT+0)]

Post a Followup