Overclocking a PII-233

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ CPU-Central Message Board ] [ Home ]

Subject: Overclocking a PII-233
Name: kakkerlakk
Date: 12/29/2000 7:10:43 AM (GMT-7)
IP Address: 24.141.254.69
Message:

I currently have this chipped overclocked to 262 Mhz. Any thoughts as to how far I can push the CPU to increase speed? I run it on an ASUS P2L97 mobo.

Thanks

[ View FollowUps | Post Followup | E-Mail Sender | Main ]

Follow Ups:

Re: Overclocking a PII-233 - Richter -[12/29/2000 7:52:44 PM (GMT+0)]
Re: Overclocking a PII-233 - LED -[12/29/2000 2:20:55 PM (GMT+0)]
- Re: Overclocking a PII-233 - Bob -[12/30/2000 1:04:49 PM (GMT+0)]
  - Re: Overclocking a PII-233 - LED -[12/30/2000 6:23:55 PM (GMT+0)]
    - Thanks (nt) - Bob -[12/30/2000 6:57:51 PM (GMT+0)]
- Re: Overclocking a PII-233 - kakkerlakk -[12/29/2000 2:25:59 PM (GMT+0)]
  - Re: Overclocking a PII-233 - LED -[12/29/2000 2:28:50 PM (GMT+0)]
Re: recommendations please!! - THUNDER -[1/1/2001 12:06:26 PM (GMT+0)]
as they stated, MSI, or the Asus - bighammer -[12/29/2000 6:09:38 PM (GMT+0)]
Re: recommendations please!! - Sledge -[12/29/2000 1:12:11 PM (GMT+0)]
- this one here? - tide -[12/29/2000 2:31:12 PM (GMT+0)]
  - No, this one - Sledge -[12/29/2000 2:33:49 PM (GMT+0)]
    - ah, okay thanks (nt) - tide -[12/29/2000 2:50:15 PM (GMT+0)]
      - or this one - LED -[12/29/2000 3:16:03 PM (GMT+0)]
        here - tide -[12/29/2000 4:42:16 PM (GMT+0)]
        what's LMK? - tide -[12/29/2000 3:22:47 PM (GMT+0)]
        Re: what's LMK? - LED -[12/29/2000 3:28:19 PM (GMT+0)]
        Turbo is sweet but... - Sledge -[12/29/2000 4:17:58 PM (GMT+0)]
        Re: Turbo is sweet but... .... yeah, I am ... - MS -[12/31/2000 11:12:29 PM (GMT+0)]
        Re: Turbo is sweet and - LED -[12/29/2000 9:53:12 PM (GMT+0)]
        Re: Turbo is sweet and - tide -[12/30/2000 11:18:38 PM (GMT+0)]
        Re: Turbo is sweet and - LED -[12/31/2000 2:02:38 AM (GMT+0)]
        Re: Turbo is sweet and - Sledge -[12/31/2000 1:59:43 PM (GMT+0)]
        Someone should - MS -[12/31/2000 11:14:50 PM (GMT+0)]
        I think someone already has - Stimp -[1/1/2001 3:07:38 AM (GMT+0)]
        >16 Eh,, mmmm.... - MS -[1/1/2001 3:41:35 PM (GMT+0)]
        >16 Re: I think someone already has - MS -[1/1/2001 3:31:24 AM (GMT+0)]
        >17 Re: I think someone already has - LED -[1/1/2001 11:15:14 AM (GMT+0)]
        I believe the proper answer to this post should be... - Sledge -[12/31/2000 11:41:06 PM (GMT+0)]
        >16 Re: I believe the proper answer to this post should be... - LED -[1/1/2001 1:02:18 AM (GMT+0)]
        >17 And this... - Sledge -[1/1/2001 1:04:06 AM (GMT+0)]
        >18 Re: And this... - tide -[1/1/2001 1:23:08 AM (GMT+0)]
        >19 hehe, - MS -[1/1/2001 2:03:22 AM (GMT+0)]
        >20 Re: hehe, - Sledge -[1/1/2001 2:43:49 AM (GMT+0)]
        >21 :-) - MS -[1/1/2001 3:27:59 AM (GMT+0)]
        >20 Re: hehe, - LED -[1/1/2001 2:09:27 AM (GMT+0)]
        >21 I got it :-) - MS -[1/1/2001 2:25:28 AM (GMT+0)]
        >22 BTW - MS -[1/1/2001 2:29:20 AM (GMT+0)]
        >23 erm... - tide -[1/1/2001 1:00:54 PM (GMT+0)]
        >24 yep - MS -[1/1/2001 3:00:16 PM (GMT+0)]
        >25 buy a - tide -[1/1/2001 3:09:21 PM (GMT+0)]
        >26 That's what I am using anyway .. - MS -[1/1/2001 9:52:31 PM (GMT+0)]
        >27 why? should it? - tide -[1/2/2001 12:10:58 PM (GMT+0)]
        >28 Re: why? - LED -[1/2/2001 1:14:56 PM (GMT+0)]
        >29 Re: why? - tide -[1/2/2001 1:49:47 PM (GMT+0)]
        >30 Re: why? - LED -[1/2/2001 2:02:58 PM (GMT+0)]
        >31 that thread - tide -[1/2/2001 2:22:02 PM (GMT+0)]
        >32 hehe - MS -[1/2/2001 3:52:08 PM (GMT+0)]
        >33 hell... - tide -[1/2/2001 4:05:19 PM (GMT+0)]
        >34 Re: hell... - LED -[1/2/2001 5:23:28 PM (GMT+0)]
        Re: Turbo is sweet and - LED -[12/31/2000 2:21:41 PM (GMT+0)]
        Re: Turbo is sweet and - tide -[12/31/2000 10:16:35 PM (GMT+0)]
        Re: what's LMK? - tide -[12/29/2000 3:37:13 PM (GMT+0)]
        YES {nt} - LED -[12/29/2000 3:38:17 PM (GMT+0)]
- abit? - tide -[12/29/2000 1:25:35 PM (GMT+0)]
  - MSI (nt) - Sledge -[12/29/2000 2:32:43 PM (GMT+0)]
    - Re: MS (I) (nt) - MS -[1/1/2001 2:30:34 AM (GMT+0)]
- Agreed - LED -[12/29/2000 1:22:02 PM (GMT+0)]
- Re: Windows 2K or Windows ME...which is better??? Nick=Jackass - mystery -[12/29/2000 7:51:10 PM (GMT+0)]
  - Win2k without a ? - cutha -[12/30/2000 1:56:02 AM (GMT+0)]
    - Re: Win2k without a ? - Sledge -[12/30/2000 1:00:41 PM (GMT+0)]
Re: How do I find what type of motherboard I have? - ran -[12/30/2000 12:31:49 AM (GMT+0)]
read the bios string - bighammer -[12/29/2000 1:03:16 PM (GMT+0)]
- talk about opposites.... - Joe F -[12/29/2000 6:25:01 PM (GMT+0)]
Re: PIII overclocking - ran -[12/31/2000 12:29:44 PM (GMT+0)]
Re: PIII overclocking - Chuck -[12/30/2000 4:14:10 PM (GMT+0)]
- Re: PIII overclocking - Chuck -[12/31/2000 3:13:00 AM (GMT+0)]
- 83 Works for me. I've got a setting via SoftFSB that keeps PCI @33. - Defender of the Faithful -[12/29/2000 4:51:41 PM (GMT+0)]
- Yep I second that... - GrimRC -[1/5/2001 9:03:32 PM (GMT+0)]
- Nope. - HalOfBorg -[12/29/2000 7:30:45 PM (GMT+0)]
Re: wcpuid says that my L3 cache doesn't exist on K6-III+ SS7. - Stephane -[1/3/2001 9:43:46 AM (GMT+0)]
- Re: Athlon 1 GHz.... - Coffster -[1/9/2001 5:44:57 PM (GMT+0)]
Re: ASUS A7M266 and GA-7DX - Keith -[1/13/2001 8:10:26 PM (GMT+0)]
Re: CPU speed Test - Stephane -[1/3/2001 9:44:52 AM (GMT+0)]
Re: Guillemot Fortissimo - Walter Morales -[1/20/2001 8:36:01 PM (GMT+0)]
Re: ASUS CUSL2 - Andrew van der Nest -[1/23/2001 10:27:32 PM (GMT+0)]
Re: CPU software - Stephane -[1/3/2001 9:47:36 AM (GMT+0)]

Maximum of 100 messages displayed.

Post a Followup

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ CPU-Central Message Board ]